DeepSummary
This episode discusses the new EPA rule limiting the levels of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) chemicals, also known as 'forever chemicals,' in drinking water. PFAS are human-made chemicals that have been used since the 1940s in various products like non-stick cookware, waterproof clothing, and firefighting foam. They don't break down easily and can accumulate in humans, animals, and the environment, leading to health issues such as cancer, fertility problems, and liver damage.
The new EPA rule sets enforceable limits on six specific PFAS chemicals in drinking water, ranging from 4 to 10 parts per trillion. While this covers only a small portion of the over 12,000 PFAS chemicals, it's a significant first step in addressing the issue. Water utilities will have to monitor and filter out excessive PFAS levels, which is expected to cost $1.5 billion annually and potentially affect water rates for consumers.
While the rule only addresses drinking water, experts believe it will have significant health benefits by reducing exposure to PFAS for millions of Americans. However, it doesn't address other sources of exposure, such as food, consumer products, or environmental pollution. Manufacturers are also exploring alternative materials to replace PFAS in products like non-stick cookware.
Key Episodes Takeaways
- The EPA has set the first nationwide limits on PFAS chemicals in drinking water, targeting six specific compounds.
- PFAS are man-made 'forever chemicals' that don't break down easily and can accumulate in the environment and human body, leading to health issues.
- The new rule aims to reduce exposure to PFAS for millions of Americans, potentially preventing illnesses and deaths.
- Implementing the rule will be costly for water utilities, potentially increasing consumer water rates.
- While a significant step, the rule does not address other sources of PFAS exposure, such as food, consumer products, or environmental pollution.
- Manufacturers are exploring alternatives to PFAS in products like non-stick cookware and waterproof clothing.
- The rule is based on extensive research on the health impacts of PFAS, but more study is needed on the effects of other PFAS compounds.
- Some experts argue for regulating PFAS more broadly as a class of chemicals rather than focusing on specific compounds.
Top Episodes Quotes
- “Even babies now are born with this in their blood.“ by Ping Wang
- “This will protect communities that know they have PFAS contamination, have not been able to get relief, and, and communities that have never known that they have contamination and will be getting relief anyways. And so that's really good.“ by Anna Reid
- “100 million people will be healthier and safer because of this action. This action will prevent thousands of deaths and reduce tens of thousands of serious illnesses.“ by Michael Regan
- “Some people are even saying that it should be regulated in a blanket way as a class of chemicals.“ by Ping Wang
- “It's understandable. PFAS stands for per fluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.“ by Ping Wang
Entities
Company
Person
Organization
Episode Information
Short Wave
NPR
4/12/24
Read more of Pien's reporting on the EPA's first ever rule on PFAS in drinking water.
Want to hear more about health and human safety? Email us at shortwave@npr.org — we might cover your question on a future episode!
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy