DeepSummary
In this episode, Mary Louise Kelly discusses the Supreme Court's upcoming hearing on the case of whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The episode highlights Trump's argument of presidential immunity from prosecution for official acts, although legal experts believe the Supreme Court is unlikely to grant him complete immunity.
The episode features insights from legal experts, including University of Texas law professor Lee Kowarski, who argues that while some form of limited immunity may be desirable for good governance, Trump's claims of immunity for his actions related to the 2020 election are unlikely to be accepted by the Supreme Court. The timing of the case is also discussed, with the possibility that a delay in the ruling could push Trump's trial past the 2024 election.
The episode also touches on the broader implications of the case, including the potential for future presidents to prosecute their predecessors and the importance of establishing precedents for presidential immunity. Overall, the episode provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal arguments and potential consequences surrounding this highly significant case.
Key Episodes Takeaways
- The Supreme Court is set to hear a case on whether former President Donald Trump can claim presidential immunity from prosecution for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.
- Legal experts believe the Supreme Court is unlikely to grant Trump complete immunity, but may establish some form of limited immunity for specific official acts.
- The timing of the Supreme Court's ruling could potentially delay Trump's trial until after the 2024 election, which could benefit him if he wins.
- The case has broader implications for the potential prosecution of future presidents by their successors, and the need for establishing precedents on presidential immunity.
- The votes of Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh, both Trump appointees, may be pivotal in determining the outcome of the case.
- The Supreme Court has never definitively ruled on the scope of presidential immunity from prosecution, making this case a significant legal precedent.
- The case raises questions about the separation of powers and the limits of executive authority, with potential long-term consequences for the balance of power in the US government.
- The outcome of the case could influence the public's perception of the rule of law and the accountability of elected officials, particularly those at the highest levels of government.
Top Episodes Quotes
- “Even an executive power person like Justice Kavanaugh surely doesn't believe that a president could order SEAL team six to assassinate political rivals without facing potential criminal consequences.“ by Rick Hasson
- “Surely the court was aware that timing is everything here. And the fact that they set this for the last week of the term, when they're going to be the busiest that they're going to be all year, it looks like they recognize that this trial may well not happen before the election.“ by Rick Hasson
- “I'm going to be watching Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh very closely. I think that the chief is probably not inclined to entertain a broad immunity in this kind of case. And so I think the median voters are really Kavanaugh and Barrett here.“ by Lee Kowarski
- “When the president does it, he said, that means that it is not illegal, that idea that you cannot prosecute someone for actions taken as president. The Supreme Court has never actually ruled on it.“ by Mary Louise Kelly
Entities
Person
Product
Organization
Company
Book
Podcast
Episode Information
Consider This from NPR
NPR
4/24/24
"When the president does it" he said "that means that it is not illegal." That idea – that you can't prosecute someone for actions taken as president - the Supreme Court has never actually ruled on it.
On Thursday, the Justices will take a crack, with the federal election interference case against former president Donald Trump hanging in the balance.
We preview how things might go.
For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.
Email us at considerthis@npr.org.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy