DeepSummary
In this episode, Jason Bordoff and Meghan O'Sullivan discuss the ongoing energy crisis exacerbated by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and its impact on the global energy transition. They explain how the crisis has forced countries to reckon with balancing short-term energy needs and long-term climate goals, leading to measures like burning more coal and subsidizing fossil fuel consumption.
The guests highlight the geopolitical implications of the energy transition, suggesting that petrostates like Russia and Saudi Arabia may gain leverage in the short term as global dependence on their supplies rises before falling. They also discuss the potential for increased government intervention in energy markets to manage the volatility of the transition process.
Additionally, the episode explores how the energy transition itself could create new geopolitical tensions, such as dependence on critical minerals and trade tensions over climate action. Overall, the guests argue that policymakers need to anticipate and manage the tumultuous nature of the transition to ensure energy security and climate progress.
Key Episodes Takeaways
- The ongoing energy crisis, exacerbated by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, has forced countries to balance short-term energy needs with long-term climate goals, leading to measures like burning more coal and subsidizing fossil fuel consumption.
- Petrostates like Russia and Saudi Arabia may gain leverage in the short term as global dependence on their supplies rises before falling during the energy transition.
- The energy transition itself could create new geopolitical tensions, such as dependence on critical minerals, trade tensions over climate action, and tensions between developed and developing countries.
- Policymakers need to anticipate and manage the tumultuous nature of the energy transition, including potential market volatility and the need for increased government intervention, to ensure energy security and climate progress.
- The current crisis highlights the unique challenges of undergoing an energy transition during a global energy shortage across multiple sources, unlike previous crises focused solely on oil.
- Public perception that climate policies endanger energy reliability, affordability, or security could undermine support for the energy transition.
- Developing countries face significant challenges in maintaining progress on climate goals during the energy crisis without substantial support from developed nations.
- The energy transition will likely lead to a more regionalized energy system, with countries becoming more self-sufficient in meeting their energy needs.
Top Episodes Quotes
- “The reality that I think everybody is waking up to is that the Middle east is going to be important for a variety of reasons, but also because of oil markets for the foreseeable future. And as we move ahead in the energy transition, actually what we need to anticipate is that the Gulf producers are going to become more geopolitically important, not less so.“ by Megan O'Sullivan
- “If people come to believe that ambitious plans to tackle climate change endanger energy reliability or affordability, or the security of energy supplies, the transition will slow.“ by Jason Bordoff
- “What we wrote in November has sort of been borne out by what we've seen in the last several months. Unfortunately, the idea behind that sentence you read was, you can't have an energy transition. If you're in the middle of an energy crisis now, some disagree with that and say that's exactly when you have a transition.“ by Megan O'Sullivan
- “To expect the developing world to be able to stay on a good climate trajectory without enormous support from other parts of the globe is really overly optimistic.“ by Megan O'Sullivan
Entities
Organization
Person
Book
Product
Episode Information
Columbia Energy Exchange
Columbia University
8/30/22
In 2020, Europe passed a landmark climate package called the Green Deal. It was supposed to mark a new era of climate progress for the region.
Few expected that two years later, Europe would be burning more coal, importing more liquified natural gas, shifting from gas to oil for industry, and spending more money to subsidize fossil fuel consumption. Europe’s energy crisis, many years in the making, has been exacerbated by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – and the subsequent turmoil in regional and global energy markets.
The past six months have proven how the global energy transition will play out in chaotic and non-linear ways.
So what will today’s energy crisis mean for the energy transition? How will governments around the world react to today’s supply shortages and price spikes? And what does the wild ride for commodities and energy pricing mean for security and climate goals around the world?
This week, we’re running an episode of the Foreign Affairs Interview podcast featuring our co-host, Jason Bordoff, and Meghan O’Sullivan, a professor of international affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School.
Meghan is the author of “Windfall: How the New Energy Abundance Upends Global Politics and Strengthens America’s Power.” And she served as deputy national security adviser for Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush Administration.
In June, Jason and Meghan joined host Dan Kurtz-Phelan to discuss their recent articles on the ongoing energy crisis. They talked about market volatility, President Biden’s trip to Saudi Arabia, and why energy is still so central to geopolitics.