DeepSummary
The episode discusses a study called the Rose study, which is collecting samples of menstrual fluid from participants with and without endometriosis, a painful disease where uterine tissue grows outside the uterus. The researchers, Christine Metz and Peter Gregerson, aim to develop a diagnostic test for endometriosis using menstrual fluid, potentially avoiding the need for invasive surgery.
Collecting and studying menstrual fluid has been challenging due to the stigma surrounding menstruation. The researchers had to overcome hurdles in finding a standardized way to collect and ship the samples, as well as convincing their own staff about the value of the research. However, their work has revealed cellular patterns that could serve as a signature for endometriosis.
While the primary goal is diagnosis, the research could also shed light on the biology of endometriosis and lead to better treatments. Additionally, menstrual fluid analysis shows promise for detecting other uterine conditions like fibroids and cancer. However, the stigma around menstruation has historically hindered research in this area.
Key Episodes Takeaways
- Menstrual fluid holds valuable information about the uterus and reproductive health, but has been historically overlooked and stigmatized.
- Researchers are conducting the Rose study to develop a non-invasive diagnostic test for endometriosis using menstrual fluid.
- They have identified cellular patterns in menstrual fluid that could serve as a signature for endometriosis diagnosis.
- Studying menstrual fluid could also lead to better understanding of endometriosis biology and improved treatments.
- Menstrual fluid analysis shows promise for detecting other uterine conditions like fibroids and cancer.
- Overcoming the stigma surrounding menstruation has been a challenge in conducting this research.
- The potential insights from menstrual fluid research are significant, making it crucial to move past the stigma hindering progress.
Top Episodes Quotes
- “Most people think of their menstrual blood as something that gets discarded, and that's how it has been viewed, something that should be discarded. But, in fact, we believe that it's a window into studying and understanding the uterus and that it's certainly a treasure, not trash, and that it holds a lot of information.“ by Christine Metz
- “We were kind of shocked because the uterus has been identified for a very long time yet to understand the uterus. No one has said, oh, well, we could study menstrual blood, and it was a shocking revelation.“ by Christine Metz
- “I think there's a big difference between annoying and shameful, right? I mean, we've missed so much, not just about periods, but about female and birthing bodies in general, because we have historically thought that they were disgusting and shameful.“ by Leah Hazard
- “The real shame here would be if we let stigma get in the way of discovering those treasures.“ by Bert Pinkerton
Entities
Company
Person
Book
Institution
Research
Episode Information
Unexplainable
Vox
3/13/24