DeepSummary
This podcast episode features a debate between Penny Green of Queen Mary University of London and Arsen Ostrovsky of the International Legal Forum on whether Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Green argues that Israel's actions, including killing civilians, inflicting harsh living conditions, and dehumanizing rhetoric, constitute genocide under the UN Genocide Convention. She cites statements by Israeli leaders as evidence of genocidal intent.
Ostrovsky rejects the accusation of genocide, arguing that Israel is defending itself against Hamas terrorism and does not intend to destroy Palestinians as a group. He contends that civilian casualties, while tragic, are an unintended consequence of war, and that Israel takes unprecedented measures to minimize them. Ostrovsky argues that Hamas' actions, including using human shields and targeting Israeli civilians, constitute genocide.
The debate covers issues such as the definition of genocide, the role of intent, the treatment of civilians in war, and the possibilities for a future resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both sides present their arguments and rebuttals, with the moderator posing questions to probe their positions further.
Key Episodes Takeaways
- Penny Green argues that Israel is committing ongoing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, based on civilian casualties, harsh living conditions, dehumanizing rhetoric, and statements indicating genocidal intent.
- Arsen Ostrovsky rejects the accusation of genocide, framing Israel's actions as self-defense against Hamas terrorism and arguing civilian deaths are an unintended consequence of war.
- The debate centers on differing interpretations of the UN Genocide Convention's definition of genocide and what constitutes genocidal intent.
- Green proposes a one-state solution with equal rights as the only viable resolution, while Ostrovsky warns this would deny Jewish self-determination.
- Both sides accuse the other of weaponizing the term genocide, reflecting how politically and emotionally charged the debate is.
- The broader context includes tensions over Palestinian statehood efforts, ICC investigations, and the role of U.S. military aid to Israel.
- The debate highlights the moral complexities and differing narratives surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Gaza situation.
- There is significant disagreement over the facts regarding Israel's military actions, civilian casualties, and treatment of Palestinians in Gaza.
Top Episodes Quotes
- “I think, yes, we are certainly witnessing, and in real time, the first genocide we have witnessed in real time taking place, committed by the israeli state against the palestinian people, particularly in Gaza.“ by Penny Green
- “To claim that Israel is perpetrating genocide, it's, quite frankly, offensive, grotesque, and a weaponization and subversion of their own meaning of the term genocide.“ by Arsen Ostrovsky
- “The only solution that I can see is a one state solution where Jews and Muslims and Christians, Palestinians, Israelis all live together, but under a situation where everybody shares equal rights.“ by Penny Green
- “Israel could not do what it does today. It could not commit genocide against the Palestinians if it was not supported by the US, if it was not given the enormous amount of military aid that it is given by the US, it could not do this.“ by Penny Green
Entities
Person
Organization
Book
Episode Information
The Munk Debates Podcast
Munk Foundation / iHeartRadio
5/28/24
The world “genocide” was first coined in the 1940s to describe the Nazi slaughter of millions of Jews.
So it is in a sense surreal that the country created in the shadow of the Holocaust, Israel, is now accused of that same horrible crime.
Those who argue that Israel is guilty of genocide in Gaza point to three of the five acts listed under the UN Genocide Convention: killing members of a group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of that group; and deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
Israel and its allies strongly reject the accusation. They say the civilian casualties in Gaza are not an intentional act of genocide, but are an inevitable, if tragic, byproduct of war. And they stress that the war is the result of the Oct. 7 massacre by Hamas, an organization that has often expressed a desire to exterminate Jews and expel them from the Holy Land – which itself would constitute genocide.
Arguing in favour of the resolution is Penny Green. She is the Director of the International State Crime Initiative at Queen Mary University of London.
Arguing against the resolution is Arsen Ostrovsky. He’s a human rights attorney and CEO of The International Legal Forum. He is also a Senior Fellow at Misgav Institute.
SOURCES: KLKNTV, PBS NewsHour, Sky News Australia
To vote on who you think won this debate, go to our website www.munkdebates.com
The host of this Munk Debates podcast episode is Ricki Gurwitz
Tweet your comments about this episode to @munkdebate or comment on our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/munkdebates/
To sign up for a weekly email reminder for this podcast, send an email to podcast@munkdebates.com.
To support civil and substantive debate on the big questions of the day, consider becoming a Munk Member at https://munkdebates.com/membership
Members receive access to our 15+ year library of great debates in HD video, a free Munk Debates book, newsletter and ticketing privileges at our live events.
This podcast is a project of the Munk Debates, a Canadian charitable organization dedicated to fostering civil and substantive public dialogue - https://munkdebates.com/
Senior Producer: Ricki Gurwitz
Producer: Daniel Kitts
Editor: Kieran Lynch