DeepSummary
The episode is a debate on whether Western governments should resume funding the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, argues in favor of resuming funding to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza caused by the Israeli blockade. He claims UNRWA provides essential healthcare, education, and aid distribution services to Palestinian refugees.
Einat Wilf, former Israeli Knesset member, argues against funding UNRWA, alleging it perpetuates the Palestinian dream of return and the elimination of Israel. She states that UNRWA schools promote an ideology of not accepting Israel's existence and that UNRWA funds have been used by Hamas for military purposes like building tunnels.
The debate delves into the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the status of Palestinian refugees, and whether a two-state solution is still viable. Roth and Wilf disagree on the role of UNRWA, with Roth viewing it as a humanitarian agency and Wilf seeing it as an obstacle to peace.
Key Episodes Takeaways
- Kenneth Roth argues that UNRWA provides essential humanitarian aid and services to Palestinian refugees, and cutting funding will worsen the crisis in Gaza.
- Einat Wilf claims UNRWA promotes an ideology of not accepting Israel's existence and a violent 'right of return', hindering prospects for peace.
- The debate centers on whether UNRWA is a neutral aid agency or an obstacle to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
- Both sides disagree on the history and root causes of the conflict, including the 1948 Palestinian exodus and the viability of a two-state solution.
- Roth and Wilf have contrasting views on Palestinian identity, with Roth seeing it as separate from UNRWA and Wilf claiming UNRWA perpetuates Palestinian refugee status.
- The alleged links between UNRWA employees/facilities and Hamas are a key point of contention in the debate over resuming UNRWA funding.
- The debate touches on broader questions of nationhood, self-determination, and how to resolve longstanding conflicts over land and identity.
- Both sides make arguments based on their interpretations of history, rights, and moral obligations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Top Episodes Quotes
- “What I know to be true, and what all of my fellow Gen Z know to be true, is that this is the most talented generation.“ by Speaker A
- “What ANRA does is it provides schooling to hundreds of thousands of palestinian children. That has nothing to do with Hamas. That's just providing basic.“ by Speaker A
- “If Unr disappeared tomorrow, the people of Gaza would still think of themselves as Palestinians who are chased from their home as refugees and who, many of whom want to go home.“ by Speaker A
- “If we want to move forward to that kind of vision onra its perpetuation of this refugee issue, the inflation of the numbers, the placing the Palestinians in this eternal limbo, of never coming to terms with the existence of a jewish state, is the guarantor that we will never have peace.“ by Speaker D
Entities
Organization
Country
Person
Book
Episode Information
The Munk Debates Podcast
Munk Foundation / iHeartRadio
2/12/24
14 countries, including Canada and the US, suspended funding to the U.N.’s Palestinian Refugee Agency in response to Israeli allegations that 12 employees were involved in the attack on Israel on October 7th, and roughly 10% of their employees in Gaza have links to Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Human rights workers argue that this is a form of collective punishment that will have dire consequences on a population already suffering from widespread hunger, displacement, and disease. Furthermore, cutting off payments to Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria could destabilize an already volatile region. UNRWA’s critics argue that by keeping Palestinians in a perpetual state of refugee status, the organization prevents them from setting down roots elsewhere in the region and thus acts as an obstacle to peace. Given the irrefutable evidence of its ties to Hamas and support of terror against Israel, they argue, there is no reason to continue to fund an agency openly committed to the right of return for Palestinian refugees and the elimination of the Jewish State.
Arguing in favour of the resolution is Kenneth Roth, the former Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
Arguing against the resolution is Einat Wilf, former member of the Israeli Knesset and the author of The War of Return: How Western Indulgence of the Palestinian Dream Has Obstructed the Path to Peace
Vote on who you think won the debate at https://munkdebates.com/podcasts/unwra-debate/
SOURCES: ABC News, UN WATCH
The host of the Munk Debates is Rudyard Griffiths
Tweet your comments about this episode to @munkdebate or comment on our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/munkdebates/
To sign up for a weekly email reminder for this podcast, send an email to podcast@munkdebates.com.
To support civil and substantive debate on the big questions of the day, consider becoming a Munk Member at https://munkdebates.com/membership
Members receive access to our 15+ year library of great debates in HD video, a free Munk Debates book, newsletter and ticketing privileges at our live events.
This podcast is a project of the Munk Debates, a Canadian charitable organization dedicated to fostering civil and substantive public dialogue - https://munkdebates.com/
Executive Producer: Ricki Gurwitz
Editor: Kieran Lynch