The viability and prospects for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are discussed by both speakers.
The feasibility and potential challenges of a two-state solution, with separate Israeli and Palestinian states, was a central topic of the debate, with participants expressing contrasting views on its viability.
The diminishing prospects for a negotiated two-state solution based on the 1967 borders is a key topic discussed.
The episode discusses the idea of a two-state solution and critiques it as legitimizing apartheid, arguing that real accountability and dismantling of the apartheid regime is necessary for a sustainable resolution.
A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to examining the viability and challenges of the two-state solution, which has been the conventional wisdom for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The podcast episodes discuss the two-state solution as a potential path to resolving the longstanding Israeli-Palestinian conflict, examining its viability, challenges, and the obstacles that have prevented its implementation.
Several episodes, such as Be it Resolved, western governments must resume funding to UNRWA, Munk Dialogue with David Horovitz: is it possible to defeat Hamas?, and Munk Dialogue with Gilead Sher: why a two-state solution is the only viable path to peace, focus on the two-state solution as a central framework for analyzing the current situation and prospects for peace.
Other episodes, like Nowhere Left to Go in Gaza as Israel's Ground Assault on Rafah Looms and Decolonize Palestine, are more critical of the two-state solution, arguing that it legitimizes an apartheid system and that a more holistic approach addressing the roots of the conflict is necessary.